Current:Home > InvestSignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:New York’s high court upholds requiring insurance to cover medically necessary abortions -ProsperityStream Academy
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:New York’s high court upholds requiring insurance to cover medically necessary abortions
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-08 12:30:33
ALBANY,SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center N.Y. (AP) — New York can continue to require companies with health insurance plans to cover medically necessary abortions, the state’s highest court ruled Tuesday.
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany and other church groups challenged the rule, arguing that the policy’s exemption for religious employers was too narrow and would force some businesses to violate their religious freedoms.
State financial regulators approved the policy in 2017. The state Legislature then separately codified the abortion coverage regulation into law in 2022. The religious groups sued over the regulation, not the law.
The Court of Appeals case had larger significance because the state’s law could be challenged using a similar legal argument, if the religious groups were successful in their case against the regulation.
Arguments before the high court last month centered on whether the state’s criteria for religious exemptions were too vague and gave officials too much discretion to determine which companies wouldn’t have to follow the rule.
The state defines a religious employer as one whose purpose is to spread religious values, primarily employs and serves people who share the same religious tenets, and is categorized as a religious nonprofit under federal law.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, called the ruling a “critical step towards protecting these fundamental freedoms.”
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany said it would appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“We believe this is unconstitutional since it involves government entanglement in the fundamental rights of free exercise of faith and conscience,” a statement from the diocese read. “The final decision on constitutionality will be by the United States Supreme Court.”
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Open Wide
- A transgender teen in Massachusetts says other high schoolers beat him at a party
- 4 Las Vegas teens plead guilty in juvenile court in beating death of classmate: Reports
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- NASA is looking for social media influencers to document an upcoming launch
- 4 friends. 3 deaths, 9 months later: What killed Kansas City Chiefs fans remains a mystery
- Consumer spending data looks solid, but some shoppers continue to struggle
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Missouri man charged in 1993 slaying of woman after his DNA matched evidence, police say
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- The Best Halloween Outfits to Wear to Universal Studios’ Halloween Horror Nights 2024
- Debate Flares Over Texas’ Proposed Oil and Gas Waste Rule
- Steward CEO says he won’t comply with Senate subpoena on hospital closings
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Debate Flares Over Texas’ Proposed Oil and Gas Waste Rule
- You Have 24 Hours To Get 50% Off the Viral Benefit Fan Fest Mascara & More Sephora Deals
- Wildlife trafficking ring killed at least 118 eagles, prosecutors say
Recommendation
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Worst team in MLB history? 120-loss record inevitable for Chicago White Sox
90-year-old Navy veteran shot, killed during carjacking in Houston, police say
North Carolina musician arrested, accused of Artificial Intelligence-assisted fraud caper
NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
How much should you have invested for retirement at age 50?
How much should you have invested for retirement at age 50?
California companies wrote their own gig worker law. Now no one is enforcing it